Neutral or angry faces buy PP58 across the entire sample (see Table ; Hypothesis b). As show in Table (section A,Analysis across complete sample),somewhat equivalent towards the findings in vmPFC,we located significant proper amygdala activity for content faces neutral faces (MNI: x ,y ,z ) and for satisfied faces angry faces (MNI: x ,y ,z ). Followup tests collapsed across the entire sample on extracted beta values at the peak voxel of activation showed that right amygdala activity (MNI: x ,y ,z ) was higher for content than neutral faces [t p .]. Again,the pattern of final results was comparable for the two age groups: young [t p .] and,marginally,older [t p .] participants showed higher amygdala activity for delighted than neutral faces. Note that contrasting young faces older faces resulted inFrontiers in Psychology Emotion ScienceJuly Volume Report Ebner et al.Neural mechanisms of reading emotionsno substantial brain activity in any region on the examined ROIs (see Hypotheses a and b). Neutral faces satisfied faces,angry faces content faces,and older faces young faces across the whole sample. The next set of analyses addressed regardless of whether there was higher dmPFC activity to neutral or angry compared to happy faces and to older in comparison to young faces across the entire sample (see Table ; Hypothesis c). As shown in Table (section A,Evaluation across entire sample),when contrasting neutral or angry with delighted faces,a region of left dmPFC showed greater BOLD response. This dmPFC area was really comparable for each neutral greater than satisfied faces (MNI: x ,y ,z ; note that for this contrast,the activity was bilateral) and angry higher than content faces (MNI: x ,y ,z. Figure A shows activity in dmPFC for the contrast neutral faces pleased faces (MNI: x ,y ,z. Followup tests across the entire sample on extracted beta values at the peak voxel of activation showed that left dmPFC activity was greater for neutral [t p .] and angry [t p .] than content faces. Figure B shows comparable benefits when examining young and older participants separately with both young [t p .] and older [t p .] participants displaying higher dmPFC activity for neutral than satisfied faces. In addition,for older faces young faces bilateral dmPFC showed greater BOLD response to older than young faces (see Table ,section A,Evaluation across entire sample). This area of dmPFC (MNI: x ,y ,z was really related towards the dmPFC area (MNI: x ,y ,z reported above for neutral faces content faces. Figure D shows this activity in dmPFC (MNI: x ,y ,z for the contrast older faces young faces. Followup pairedsample t tests across the entire sample on extracted beta values in the peak voxel of activation showed that activity in left dmPFC was higher for older than young faces [t p .]. Figure E presents the PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18175099 data separately for young and older adults and shows that for older [t p .],but only marginally young [t p .],participants left dmPFC activity was greater for older than young faces. Note that even in the decrease threshold (p . uncorrected,variety of contiguous voxels unspecified),there was no significant amygdala activation for this set of contrasts. Satisfied faces vs. neutral faces and satisfied faces vs. angry faces in interaction with participant age group. Determined by previous analysis,for any next set of analyses we had the particular hypothesis that there would be higher dmPFC activity to neutral or angry than satisfied faces in older than young adults (see Table ; Hypothesis d). We also examined participant agegroup variations in vmPFC and amygda.